Managing rent reviews under the Renters’ Rights Act: Process and tribunal risks

The Renters' Rights Act fundamentally changes rent review procedures, limiting increase frequency, strengthening tenant challenge rights, and creating tribunal risks for landlords implementing excessive or improperly procedural increases.

No. 14934 from our magazine|2 min read| Published in Magazine on 21 April 2026 by our Marketing Team

Understanding compliant processes and evidence standards proves essential for successful rent management under new requirements.

Annual increase limitation now mandatory

Rent increases are restricted to once per twelve-month period maximum. This applies to all tenancies regardless of when they commenced, affecting both new agreements and existing arrangements.

Calculate twelve-month periods from previous increase dates rather than tenancy start dates if these differ. Attempting increases more frequently than annually breaches regulations, rendering notices invalid and exposing landlords to enforcement action.

Proper notice procedures required

Landlords must use prescribed Section 13 notice forms when proposing rent increases. These forms require specific information including current rent, proposed new rent, effective date, and explanations of tenant challenge rights.

Notice periods depend on tenancy types. Monthly tenancies require one month minimum notice, whilst longer periodic tenancies need notice periods matching rent payment frequency up to six months maximum.

Defective notices lacking required information or using incorrect forms invalidate entire increase proposals regardless of whether proposed amounts represent fair market rates.

Market evidence requirements

When proposing increases, research comparable rental properties thoroughly. Document similar properties’ rents including locations, sizes, conditions, and any relevant differences affecting rental values.

This evidence becomes crucial if tenants challenge increases through tribunals. Landlords must demonstrate proposed rents reflect genuine market rates rather than arbitrary amounts or excessive increases exploiting tenant circumstances.

Save property portal listings, speak with local agents about typical rents, and maintain records of comparable properties supporting your proposed increase amounts.

First-tier Tribunal challenge process

Tenants can challenge rent increases they consider excessive by referring proposals to the First-tier Tribunal. Tribunals determine appropriate market rents based on comparable evidence and current conditions.

Tribunals can reduce proposed increases, maintain current rents, or in some cases set rents below current levels if evidence suggests existing rents exceed market rates. These determinations become binding, with landlords unable to implement refused increases.

Tribunal evidence standards

Tribunals expect comprehensive comparable evidence from both parties. Landlords should prepare detailed submissions including recent comparable lettings, property condition descriptions, any improvements justifying increases, and local market analyses.

Weak evidence or arbitrary increase justifications typically result in tribunal reductions. Professional rental valuations from qualified surveyors strengthen positions, though costs should be weighed against disputed increase amounts.

Risk assessment before proposing increases

Before proposing increases, assess realistically whether tenants might challenge and whether you could successfully defend amounts at tribunal. Modest increases reflecting clear market evidence rarely face challenges, whilst aggressive rises often prompt tribunal referrals.

Consider tenant quality, payment history, and relationship strength. Losing good tenants through excessive increase attempts often costs more through void periods and remarketing than modest increases maintaining occupancy.

Strategic increase timing

Whilst annual increases are permitted, they’re not mandatory. Consider whether market conditions, tenant circumstances, and property performance justify increases or whether rent stability better serves long-term portfolio interests.

During weak rental markets, attempting increases risks tenant departures to better-valued alternatives, creating void periods exceeding any gained income from successful increases.

Communication approach matters

Explain increase reasoning to tenants before formal notices, discussing market conditions and comparable properties. This transparency often prevents challenges by helping tenants understand increases reflect market reality rather than landlord opportunism.

Tenants receiving unexplained notices proposing substantial increases frequently challenge through tribunals, whilst those understanding reasoning often accept reasonable rises without dispute.

Increase amount calculations

Calculate increases as percentages of current rents rather than fixed amounts. Market-driven percentage increases typically prove more defensible at tribunals than arbitrary round-number rises disconnected from actual rental value changes.

Research typical annual rental growth rates in your areas. Increases significantly exceeding local norms invite challenges unless specific property improvements or market shifts justify premium growth.

Tenant retention value

Weigh the increase income against retention value. Annual increases of £50-£100 monthly might gain £600-£1,200 yearly but risk losing tenants whose departures cost thousands through void periods, remarketing, and potential rent reductions attracting replacements during competitive markets.

Documentation throughout

Maintain comprehensive records of increase processes including market research, notice service dates, tenant communications, and reasoning supporting proposed amounts. These records prove invaluable defending tribunal challenges or demonstrating compliant procedures during enforcement investigations.

Professional advice reduces risks

Letting agents and property solicitors help navigate rent review procedures, ensuring compliant notices, appropriate increase amounts, and strong tribunal defenses if challenges arise. Their expertise often prevents costly procedural failures or excessive increase attempts prompting avoidable disputes.

This article was originally published by BriefYourMarket and is reproduced here with their permission.

For more company news and insights from Pygott & Crone, click here

HOW CAN WE HELP?