What landlords can do to protect against tenant fraud What landlords can do to protect against tenant fraud

What landlords can do to protect against tenant fraud

What landlords can do to protect against tenant fraud A survey of 1,000 UK landlords published in July 2026 found that 77% believe tenant fraud has become more common over the past three years.

No. 15368 from our magazine|2 min read| Published in Magazine on 21 August 2026 by our Marketing Team

Of those, 39% said it has become significantly more common and a further 38% reported a noticeable increase. One in ten landlords in the survey had experienced tenant fraud directly. The findings are a useful prompt for landlords to examine whether their current referencing and screening processes are giving them sufficient visibility of the people to whom they are granting access to their property.

What the fraud looks like

The most common form, reported in 34% of direct fraud cases in the survey, involved tenants deliberately failing to pay rent after providing misleading information during the application process. This is the category with the clearest prevention pathway: thorough income verification and credit referencing at the application stage significantly reduces the pool of applicants who could plausibly sustain this approach.

More serious were the cases where landlords had unknowingly allowed their property to be used for criminal activity, which affected 19% of those who had experienced fraud. Unauthorised subletting and rent-to-rent arrangements accounted for a further 10%. False employment or income information and undisclosed occupants each appeared in 9% of the most significant incidents reported.

The financial picture

Almost a quarter of landlords who experienced fraud said the most serious incident had cost them £5,000 or more. A further 22% reported losses of between £2,500 and £4,999. Only 2% said they had suffered no financial loss. Just under a third absorbed the loss without recovering money. Over a fifth resolved the matter through formal eviction proceedings, and 12% said their most significant case remained unresolved.

Most landlords who had experienced fraud reported a single incident in five years. However, nearly a third had faced multiple incidents, which suggests that once a landlord’s property or portfolio has been targeted, the risk of recurrence is real.

What landlords can do

The protection that is most consistently effective against the forms of fraud the data describes is thorough, consistent referencing at the application stage. Verifying the income an applicant declares, rather than taking it on assertion, requires payslips or tax returns for the self-employed, bank statements that show the pattern of income and outgoings, and direct employment verification with the named employer. Each of these steps is straightforward and adds a layer of documentary evidence that makes misleading information considerably harder to sustain.

The Renters’ Rights Act introduced anti-discrimination provisions from 1 May 2026 that prohibit landlords from applying blanket exclusions based on benefit status or the presence of children. Referencing processes must therefore be grounded in genuine, individually assessed affordability evidence rather than categorical exclusions. The standard that the law requires is the same standard that good fraud prevention demands: consider each applicant individually, document the decision, and base it on verified information rather than assumptions.

Right to Rent checks remain a legal requirement and provide a degree of identity verification as part of the standard onboarding process. From 1 October 2026, digital Right to Rent checks must use a registered provider where conducted electronically. Carrying these out properly, retaining the documentation, and being alert to documents that appear inconsistent or incomplete is a baseline that every landlord should have in place.

For landlords managing multiple properties or those who have experienced fraud before, working through a managing agent with robust referencing processes and access to professional tenant screening platforms adds a layer of systematic protection that self-managing alone cannot easily replicate.

Talk to our lettings team about protecting your property

This article was originally published by BriefYourMarket and is reproduced here with their permission.

For more company news and insights from Pygott & Crone, click here

Latest news

One third of properties need price reductions: How to avoid joining them 
Magazine | 14 October 2026

One third of properties need price reductions: How to avoid joining them 

January 2026 brought a strong start to the property market.

Mortgage rates and what they mean for buyers and sellers
Magazine | 14 October 2026

Mortgage rates and what they mean for buyers and sellers

Mortgage rates and what they mean for buyers and sellersMortgage rates are one of the most significant factors in the UK property market, influencing how much buyers can borrow, which price brackets are accessible, and how sellers should calibrate their expectations.

What buyers are actually doing during a viewing, and why it matters
Magazine | 14 October 2026

What buyers are actually doing during a viewing, and why it matters

What buyers are doing during a viewing, and why it matters A viewing typically lasts thirty to forty-five minutes, and within that window a browser becomes a buyer, or does not.

Preparing for a valuation visit: What agents actually look at
Magazine | 14 October 2026

Preparing for a valuation visit: What agents actually look at

Preparing for a valuation visit: What agents actually look atMost sellers tidy the house before an agent comes to value it, which is sensible enough.

Chat live

Chat live with a member of staff

Please provide your name and email address to continue.