Tenant retention in 2026: Why keeping good tenants beats re-letting

```htmlThe numbers that define the current lettings market tell a clear story about supply and demand.

No. 15003 from our magazine|2 min read| Published in Magazine on 20 May 2026 by our Marketing Team

According to Propertymark’s January 2026 housing insight report, new fully managed property instructions fell to an average of 3.87 per member branch, while each available property attracted an average of seven applicants. Stock is tight, competition among tenants is real, and the market shows no sign of rebalancing quickly.

In that environment, the instinct might be to assume that landlords hold all the cards. In practice, the landlords who think most carefully about 2026 are the ones who understand that retaining a good tenant is considerably more valuable than replacing one.

The true cost of re-letting

The costs of a tenancy ending are rarely totted up in full, but they are significant. A void period of even two to three weeks represents lost rental income that no subsequent tenant can recover. Add to that the cost of a professional clean, any redecoration or minor repairs required to bring the property back to letting standard, re-listing fees, and the administrative time involved in referencing and onboarding a new tenant, and the true cost of turnover becomes clear.

Beyond the financial figure, there is also the less quantifiable cost of uncertainty. A new tenant is an unknown quantity. A tenant who has paid reliably, maintained the property well, and caused no significant issues is a known one. In a market where 29% of adults reported difficulty covering rent or mortgage payments in early 2026, according to Propertymark data, the value of a financially stable, dependable tenant should not be understated.

What the Renters’ Rights Act changes about retention

The Renters’ Rights Act 2025, which came into force on 1 May 2026, has shifted the structural context of retention in ways that matter to both parties. All tenancies are now open-ended assured periodic agreements. There is no automatic end date, no fixed-term renewal to negotiate, and no Section 21 backstop for landlords who simply want a change. Tenancies now continue until either party takes deliberate action to end them.

For landlords, this makes the relationship with an existing tenant more significant than it has ever been. A tenant who is settled, satisfied, and not actively looking for alternatives is a tenant who is likely to stay. Proactive, respectful management is now the most effective retention strategy available, and it costs considerably less than re-letting.

For tenants, the legislation offers greater security than the fixed-term model ever did. There is no pressure to negotiate a renewal or manage the anxiety of an approaching end date. The tenancy continues, and the right to remain is protected as long as the tenant meets their obligations. That security has real value, and tenants who recognise it in a supply-constrained market are often among the most stable and consistent.

What good retention looks like in practice

For landlords, retention begins well before a tenancy reaches any kind of pressure point. Responding promptly to maintenance requests, keeping the property in good condition, and communicating clearly and respectfully throughout the tenancy are the foundations. Tenants who feel that issues are taken seriously and resolved without unnecessary delays are considerably less likely to begin looking elsewhere.

Rent reviews handled fairly and transparently also play a role. Under the new legislation, increases must follow the formal Section 13 process with at least two months’ written notice. Landlords who approach rent reviews as a straightforward, evidence-based conversation rather than an adversarial one tend to find tenants more receptive, and more inclined to stay even when an increase is proposed.

Acknowledging a tenant’s length of service with the property is also worth considering. A tenant who has rented from you for three years without incident has saved you the cost and disruption of at least two re-lets. Treating that relationship accordingly is not sentimentality. It is good asset management.

The bigger picture

In a market with seven applicants per available property, it can be tempting to view demand as a safety net that makes retention less important. The landlords who perform best over time tend to think differently. They understand that the cost of turnover is real, that good tenants are genuinely valuable, and that the effort invested in keeping them is consistently worth more than the effort required to find someone new.

Our lettings team can help you manage your tenancy relationships and reduce void periods. Get in touch today.

This article was originally published by BriefYourMarket and is reproduced here with their permission.

For more company news and insights from Pygott & Crone, click here

HOW CAN WE HELP?